Depression and anxiety in patients with uveal melanoma undergoing curative proton treatment-A prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: We prospectively addressed whether patient characteristics, oncological outcomes, or metastatic risk impacted depression and anxiety in patients undergoing curative proton treatment for uveal melanoma (UM). METHODS: We assessed patient-reported outcomes regarding anxiety (GAD-7) before and 2 years after proton therapy and depression (PHQ-9) before, 1, and 2 years after proton therapy. We performed descriptive statistics and used linear mixed effect modeling to analyze how the oncological outcome and baseline characteristics impacted anxiety and depression scores. RESULTS: Of 130 (65 female) patients included, six developed metastatic disease and three died during the 2-year follow-up. The mean anxiety declined from 5.86 (SE = 0.56) at baseline to 3.74 (SE = 0.46) at 2 years (ß = 2.11; SE = 0.6; p < .001). Depressive symptoms decreased moderately from 4.36 (SE = 0.37) at baseline to 3.67 (SE = 0.38) 2 years later. Patients with unfavorable metastatic risk or disease progression had elevated anxiety and depression scores. Although female patients reported overall higher anxiety scores, both sexes recovered substantially and to a similar extent during the 2-year follow-up (ß = 2.35; SE 0.87; p = .007 vs. ß = 1.88; SE = 0.60; p = .002). A trend for prolonged depressive symptoms was observed in patients living alone compared to patients living with family members 1 year after the treatment (M = 5.04 [SE = 0.85] vs. M = 3.73 [SE = 0.31], ß = 1.32; SE = 0.92; p = .152). Patients with high baseline anxiety levels showed initially more severe depressive symptoms, which improved significantly during follow-up (ß = 1.65; SE = 0.68; p = .017). CONCLUSION: Most patients undergoing proton therapy for UM experienced mild, transient depressive symptoms and anxiety. Patients with high pre-treatment anxiety, unfavorable prognoses, and patients living alone may be more vulnerable to prolonged depressive symptoms. To these patients a more tailored support could be offered at an early stage of the disease.

Fear of prognosis? How anxiety, coping, and expected burden impact the decision to have cytogenetic assessment in uveal melanoma patients.

BACKGROUND: Cytogenetic testing (CGT) in uveal melanoma patients reveals prognostic information about the individual risk of developing distant metastasis with dismal prognosis. There is currently no medical intervention strategy with proven effect on the prognosis, rendering the result of the cytogenetic testing purely informative. We explored patients' socio-demographic backgrounds, psychological preconditions, coping strategies, external influences, and concerns about "knowing their fate" to study their possible interactions with decision-making for CGT. METHODS: Uveal melanoma patients were asked to complete questionnaires on their interest in undergoing CGT for prognostication and the factors influencing their decision. Data were collected on socio-demographics, baseline anxiety (GAD-7), depression (PHQ-9), coping strategies (Brief COPE), and assumed future concerns regarding the CGT result. Data were analyzed by using multiple ordinal logistic regression and exploring estimated marginal effects. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned by 121 of 131 (92.4%) patients. Fifty-two patients (43%) had no interest in CGT, 34 (28.1%) were undecided, and 35 (28.9%) were interested. We observed no significant differences regarding age, sex, partnership, education, occupation, baseline anxiety, or depression. Decision-making favoring CGT was influenced by the treating physicians, internet resources, and level of baseline anxiety. Patients were likely to reject CGT when they worried that "knowing the result will have an unintended influence" on their life. CONCLUSION: Decision-making about CGT for prognostication in uveal melanoma is burdensome to many patients and in general not guided by medical advice regarding further treatment and screening procedures. The psychological impact of the decision is therefore unique and requires careful support by psycho-oncologists considering the patient's fears and expectations.

Ab interno canaloplasty (ABiC)-12-month results of a new minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS).

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to assess whether the ab interno canaloplasty is a reasonable minimally invasive method to lower significantly the IOP level and number of antiglaucomatous medication over a certain period of time in adult primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort outcome study, 36 eyes of 28 POAG patients (mean age 74.8 ± 9.3 years) with an IOP above target pressure were included. Ab interno canaloplasty (ABiC) was performed in all subjects (MEyeTech GmbH, Alsdorf, Germany) as sole procedure in pseudophakic eyes (n = 20) or in combination with cataract surgery in phakic eyes (n = 16). The intraocular pressure (IOP) and the number of glaucoma medication were assessed preoperatively, day 1, week 6, month 3, month 6, and month 12. RESULTS: IOP decreased from 19.8 ± 4.1 to 13.8 ± 3 mmHg at 12 months follow-up (n = 21, p < 0.001). The IOP reduction showed significant results at all time points (1 day p < 0.001; 6 weeks p < 0.001; 3 months p < 0.001; 6 months p = 0.001; 12 months p < 0.001). Glaucoma therapy was stabilized at 2.1 ± 1.6 number of medications after 12 months postoperatively. There was no significant difference in the number of medication at 12 months follow-up (p = 1.0). No major perioperative complications can be reported. CONCLUSION: The ABiC effectively lowers the IOP in POAG in the short term follow-up of 12 months. A reduction of glaucoma therapy cannot be achieved and should be discussed with the patients prior to surgery.

iStent inject as a reasonable alternative procedure following failed trabeculectomy?

PURPOSE:: The aim of this study is to assess the intraocular pressure lowering effect and the performance of the glaucoma therapy of the iStent inject in glaucoma patients with uncontrolled intraocular pressure after failed trabeculectomy. METHODS:: In this retrospective study, iStent inject implantation (Glaukos Corporation, Laguna Hills, CA, USA) was performed in 22 eyes of 21 subjects suffering from glaucoma (n = 18 primary open angle glaucoma, n = 3 pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, and n = 1 for secondary glaucoma) with an intraocular pressure above target pressure after failed trabeculectomy (mean = 9.6 ± 8.1 years; range: 1-35 years). The intraocular pressure and the number of antiglaucomatous medication were assessed preoperatively, 1 day, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery and compared to preoperative findings (SPSS v23.0; Shapiro-Wilk test, Wilcoxon test, Friedman test). RESULTS:: The results showed a significant intraocular pressure decrease from 22.5 ± 4.6 to 15.5 ± 3.4 mmHg after 1 year follow-up (p = 0.012). The glaucoma therapy was 2.6 ± 1.2 preoperatively and reduced to 2.25 ± 1.5 number of medications after 1 year (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the number of medication during the whole follow-up period (1 year, p = 0.012). No significant intra- or postoperative complications were reported. CONCLUSION:: Minimal invasive glaucoma surgery (iStent inject) can offer an effective intraocular pressure reduction in advanced adult primary and secondary open angle glaucoma after failed trabeculectomy in a follow-up period of 1 year. Glaucoma therapy, however, needs to be maintained to achieve an individual target pressure and to prevent glaucoma progression. In addition, a failure rate of 27.3% makes it necessary to select carefully patients for this treatment option.